Human Tides

Spring is here in England, a time of love and bloodyminded hope. But we know that away from the riversides, down from the hills, past the rows of the serial houses in their parallel and seemingly never-ending lines, only just over the thin band of sea, thousands of people are still enduring truly miserable conditions, holding out for the dream of some kind of better life, or simply driven by an instinct to survive.

We all of us know they are there, just as we all know of the numbers of refugees in Europe, of the cruel dynamics of distant wars and unrest. It’s wrong to think that people are simply not aware or bury their minds through not caring. It’s more like a kind of white heat of the knowledge of the massive human need. But even when we face up to the scale of the problem, we know we have a duty for the refugees. Shunting them out of public sight, spending resources on fences and ‘keeping them out’ is surely a rough denial of this charge. We must still respect and enshrine the need for human dignity and be clear that places of refuge in Europe should at the very least live up to the standards required of the most basic refugee camps. We should all push for a greater drive to address the situation, to make life better for the people so close to our shores, to accommodate those that we can.

That conditions at the camps at Calais and Dover are a searing indictment of Europe’s ability to provide what should be a given is equally a token of the burden on us all. We can’t afford to look away or hope the problem will just disappear without sufficient engagement on our part. Perhaps too we are aware that in this age of climate change, wars for resources and tensions in the Middle East – some of which go back for a century in the face of the great Western-led carve up of traditional borders, as well as more recent colossal mistakes – we will have to learn to come to some kind of greater provision for the mass movement of people. For as much as the challenge is daunting, it is the global South, as Caroline Moorehead wrote recently, that is facing the larger part of this crisis. It may well even be that this wave of immigration could be part of the answer to the West’s problem of a top-heavy and aging population.

What’s clear is that old certainties and clinging to a sense of former order do not address the realities of the times we are in. If that seems in any way a stretch we must still be informed by our wishes for compassion and a decent provision for those who have placed themselves at our mercy. We cannot revert to what has been termed a new brutality. We must find ourselves fit for these extraordinary events.

Perhaps that’s why the recent Dubs amendment has caught so much of the public mood; from the sense that for some children at least we can make a real difference in the face of what can seem insurmountable odds. The numbers remain undefined and it’s down to us all to now make our voices heard amidst local authorities who carry the responsibility to find homes and places for these children, whose drive will determine the numbers we all can take in. It may seem a small thing given the scale of the challenge but it is at least a start and a sign of what can be done when people engage with the issue – however tawdry the political process itself may at other times seem.

We all of us know of the almost intolerable burden of seeing, reading and hearing about the refugees, of the silent press of an invisible force of expectation, of the will and the need to do something in the face of almost incomprehensible statistics. We all need to know how to go on. Perhaps our best hope is to never forget all those over the sea, to never let ourselves think this is someone else’s problem, that the migrants are driven by forces that do not concern us, that humanity is still somehow tiered and we can afford to push away the pixilated numbers on our screens.

These times should be a wake up call such as we have not seen since the end of the Second World War. That era, marked with such uncertainty but also a resurgent human spirit ought to be able to help to spur us on. We can still have our dreams of what humanity can look like and are being called upon to demonstrate them now. The Dubs amendment may be a drop in the ocean but it’s one that still shows what we can do. Let’s build upon it for the sake of all those unaccompanied children in Europe and further afield, whose fate stands as such a stark accusation and which scours us all with the knowledge of the need we have to act.

Take Them In

By Jim Hindle, Dec 17 2015 03:04PM

All over the country, people are winding down and clocking off, the lights of pubs and restaurants loom large as we try and put another year behind us, as we look to the new one ahead. But it hardly needs saying of course that others are keen in our minds; all of those driven by wars, part of the huge tide of humanity that have been moving north since at least this last spring and, further south, for much longer.

It can be hard to know how to respond. We can throw money at the problem, as our government have with more than £800 million allocated to refugee camps in the Middle East. But we know too they are effectively ignoring manifestations of the issue much nearer to home, namely the camp that has sprung up and swelled on our border, just over the Channel at Calais. Just reading about the conditions at such camps is harrowing. Peter Sutherland, the UN special representative on migration said after visiting Calais in the Autumn that it would take him some time to recover from the shock of seeing the reality on the ground there, while Leigh Daynes, director of Doctors of the World, who has experience in Haiti, described it as “a humanitarian emergency of the first order.” The numbers of refugees in the place have almost doubled since those statements were made.

It barely needs rehearsing but, lest we forget, it’s worth noting what those conditions actually mean. Around six thousand men, women and children are camped out in summer tents and tiny, knocked-together shanty huts, largely dependent on the one meal a day provided by volunteers, prone to gastric and respiratory infections and scabies, where water sources are contaminated by human faeces, where the sense of any order can be aggravated by gang culture, where it is hard to get warm in the damp and the cold and people stoke fires with plastic.

It maddening to contemplate that – so close to us – ordinary people, who left what once were good homes and jobs are facing a European winter without the very basics of adequate shelter and warmth. And maddening too that so many in authority seem so intent on ignoring the problem. “Let’s not encourage them,” goes the thinking, “let’s not pave the way for thousands more by the signals we send.” And so the people there are classified as regrettable statistics the UK is unwilling to do anything about.

It’s a duplicitous policy at best, as made clear by the fact we have spent some £15 million on fences for the tunnel and ferry terminal at Calais, effectively a huge sign to keep out. Meanwhile there has been next to no support from the British or French governments, not even to provide the basic conditions you might expect to find in refugee camps. There are some 40 toilets, or one for every 75 people; way short of the one for every 20 cited as necessary for emergency situations in refugee camps by the UNHCR. Children are arriving unaccompanied and many are subject to illness and infection due to the camp expanding over what was the old unofficial latrine.

Volunteers and a few charities are attempting to pick up the slack but it’s a huge task with not enough co-ordination and it’s clear we are failing the people camped there. Where are the resources that such a humanitarian crisis should ensure? Is this the new reality for people fleeing war, persecution and hunger all over Europe; a cold shoulder and indifference from on high? A drawing up of borders for lack of political will? A hope that somehow the problem will go away if only we ignore it long enough, manage expectations and keep the trucks rolling to and throe untroubled?

It would be easier to understand if it didn’t seem so casually harsh, if it didn’t take its place amid an austerity where the poor should be silenced and brushed under the carpet so long as shopping and drinking goes on for the rest of the population. The migrants in Calais are part of the new destitute, part of a cold calculus of winners and losers, where sympathy from governments is hard to find.

Are we really prepared to accept this? Can we really stomach looking on as people slowly fall apart before our eyes? Can we take no lead from the time of that last great migration in the wake of the Second World War when millions of refugees were given succour by international aid and the will of Western countries, buoyed by victory but staring at a financial landscape no less sobering that the one we face today?

In the absence of such help we know that we must do what we can, as everyday people, to help. But let’s not forget that our governments ought to show responsibility here as well, beyond meagre steps to take in a few thousand a year. We cannot continue to ignore such tragic conditions only one short stretch of water away. This country has been made up of waves of immigration down the years and we should not look the other way when so many people need help. At the very least we should be helping ensure a standard of living expected for refugee camps.

These are the times of great crisis and we will be remembered in history by the caliber of our response. As ever in Britain in these times it seems, it falls to the people to act while a ruling elite bathes in the spoils of electoral carnage. We can do better as a country and we should expect those in Parliament to respond to these times with a greater compassion. That isn’t high-minded thinking; it’s a cry for basic human dignity. It stands as a test for us all.